The Psychic Body: Spiritual Evolution

“Better remain silent, better not even think, if you are not prepared to act.” ..Annie Besant

The development most likely to unite science and religion is verification that apart from the physical body we know and love, there is a more subtle element which so far, is only detectable by inference from external bodily actions, and of course by intuition.  This element is the architect and scaffold of what we perceive as the physical structure, reacts in a consistent and predictable way, and forms the most influential part of the human personality.  If it can be shown that religion is actually man’s first steps at understanding the nature of this intangible element, science and religion would become partners, each changing the other’s view of mankind, life and the universe.

The psychic body has long been spoken about in literature concerned with psychic matter.  Annie Besant, a 19th century social activist, became interested in such matters after being asked to write a review of Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine.  Seeking an interview with Blavatsky, she became impressed by the author’s Theosophy, and eventually abandoned her Marxist links in favour of it: she even represented Theosophy at the Chicago World’s Fair in 1893.   Her later alliance with Charles Leadbeater promoted the premise that humanity also had a psychic component, which had to be taken into consideration when attempting the betterment of society.  Leadbeater, amid much controversy, later introduced a young Krishnamurti to the world as a bearer of truth.  Whether prohetic or not, this turned out to be the case as eventually Krishnamurti, severing ties with the institutional forms encrusting him, became a world renowned speaker on the psychic nature of man.

Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine was an ambitious two-volume attempt to frame the origin of the Universe and the development of mankind along ages-long cosmic cycles of energetic activity and rest.   She proposed that each physical race – oriental, pacific, caucausian, arabic, etc – was gifted with various qualities which created certain challenges and lessons to learn.  Underlying all this was her belief that “All men have spiritually and physically the same origin, which is the fundamental teaching of Theosophy”.

Music of Mendelssohn, from Thought Forms by Besant and Leadbeater

When I was 19 someone gave me an already well-worn book called Thought Forms, produced in 1901 by Besant and Leadbeater, which intriguingly attempted to define musical forms in colour:

“We have often heard it said that thoughts are things, and there are many among us who are persuaded of the truth of this statement. Yet very few of us have any clear idea as to what kind of thing a thought is, and the object of this little book is to help us to conceive this.“

…Naturally every sound makes its impression upon astral and mental matter—not only those ordered successions of sounds which we call music. Some day, perhaps, the forms built by those other less euphonious sounds may be pictured for us, though they are beyond the scope of this treatise;

“…It is well for us ever to bear in mind that there is a hidden side to life—that each act and word and thought has its consequence in the unseen world which is always so near to us, and that usually these unseen results are of infinitely greater importance than those which are visible to all upon the physical plane.”

At the same time this book was written, Picasso was cultivating the mental perspective to conceive of cubism, having already accumulated the artistic skills with which to express it.  Cubism required one to accept that an illustration could be more than a pleasing rendering of the physical world, but hint at other dimensions too, and thereby become a deeper representational truth.  This groundbreaking idea required a huge mental leap both for Picasso, his collaborator Charles Braque, and indeed their audience.

The idea that three dimensions might be shown on a two dimensional surface had long intrigued artists.  Techniques such as the mechanical vanishing points, and atmospheric perspective had grown in maturity but attempting to add the dimension of time was a remarkable step.  Gauguin and Van Gogh had already used colour as a symbol for deeper ideas, but they had stayed within the same representational framework.  To step outside of this required a new way of drawing, but also, a completely new way of thinking: all standard pictorial symbolism had to be abandoned and demanded a mature insight to express, and to understand.

Braque’s Fruit Dish, 1909

Cubism could never have made an entrance as anything but an eccentricity even fifty years earlier, and would have been ample proof of insanity before then.  Its development and acceptance shows not only that mankind had progressed mentally – which could only have proceeded from changes in the brain – but that the works of genius had a hand in focusing this development.  As a result cubism, after being mocked at its introduction, became the single most significant artistic leap of the 20th century.

The idea that genius is a first arrival at a destination towards which the mass of mankind is evolving at a slower rate has a significance for religion too.  The predominant religious images of advanced moral products – e.g., the saints, Buddha, Christ, and the virginal Mary – all incorporate an element of divinity within a human form.  Even Christ, who some suppose to be the Son of God, after any analysis remains also a human being.  Hinduism attempts also to give a human form to divine elements, such as Shiva and Shakti, which might be traced to the ancient traditions of Gods as visible deities.  But the prevailing idea of the more recent religions is not so much the image of God, but of a human being who incorporates features of divinity.  This is remarkable as it coincides with an age in which man has attempted to penetrate veil after veil of the material and intellectual world, trying to reach ultimate knowledge and certainty about the nature of the Universe, always struggling under the limitations of the intellect.

Spiritual ideals often emerge intuitively in literature.  Pinocchio represented a perishable life form growing through moral behaviour to build a bodily form existing on a higher level, guided by a blue spirit and a material conscience.  Jack Kirby’s Silver Surfer portrayed man as on the lowest rung of evolution, whose problems could be seen from an advanced stage as the result of materialsm and lack of moral development

Blavatsky claimed Hinduism predicted the rise of science, and even prepared the mental cradle from which it could emerge.  Be that as it may, the religions of the world have a bearing on modern development as they show an evolutionary target, and a viable path towards its attainment.  These spiritual paths are enshrined in scriptures, and the theology and dogma they have accumulated does not detract at all from their value.  In fact this accumulation of dogma when receding in the dimension of time away from the initial inspiration has a parallel in scientific thought – the founders of science were not interested in creating machines which cooked the human race alive: Einstein himself was appalled, and wrote, “had I known, I would have been a locksmith.”

Likewise, evolutionary theory is corrupted over time into forms of convenience suiting the mental preference of its followers: Darwin did not believe in chance evolution, clearly stating that such an idea was unscientific, as evolution continually moved onward and upward, while chance never moves in a single direction.  His thinking was tinged with a strong moral component, typical in a time still coloured by religious upbringing and ways of thought.  His modern supporters believe only in randomness, and generally abandon morality in favour of mercilessly critical thought.  Perhaps we can attribute such a degeneration to the abandoning of spiritual ideals.

Time and space, according to Einstein’s theories of relativity, are woven together, forming a four-dimensional fabric called “space-time.” The tremendous mass of Earth dimples this fabric, much like a heavy person sitting in the middle of a trampoline. Gravity, says Einstein, is simply the motion of objects following the curvaceous lines of the dimple (NASA)

Einstein was representative of the same subtle shift in humanity’s approach which Picasso expressed.  Intertwining time and space was not for artistic impact, but reflected a truth in the hard-headed world of physics: Picasso’s transformation was the same mental leap, but from a brain specifically configured, from birth, for art.

The fact that all these extraordinary new ideas emerged within the space of only six or seven years in three unrelated geographical and social areas of the world – Einstein absorbed in the scientific world in Germany, Picasso and Braque as carefree Parisian artists, and Besant and Leadbeater as social activists (Besant had long been a champion of contraception, and had even lost custody of her children in a dispute with the industrial factions) in America – show that a development within the race as a whole must have been at work, at a particular point in its evolution.

This subtle movement in thought – again, only possible by changes within the brain – was expressed in a variety of ways by those most susceptible to its influence, by some genetic predisposition, some advantageous circumstance of liberty and freedom of thought.  All these individuals arrived at their various conclusions through their own efforts, having single-mindedly prepared their brains through steady labour.

“The Spanish struggle is the fight of reaction against the people, against freedom. My whole life as an artist has been nothing more than a continuous struggle against reaction and the death of art. How could anybody think for a moment that I could be in agreement with reaction and death? … In the panel on which I am working, which I shall call Guernica, and in all my recent works of art, I clearly express my abhorrence of the military caste which has sunk Spain in an ocean of pain and death.”

These minds were also acutely aware of a responsibility to society as a whole, something essential for every groundbreaking innovation.  It is therefore to the sensitive mind of the creative personality that we can also find hints as to moral guidance.  Picasso, the experimenter with an eye for commercial appeal, made the colossal Guernica – war seen through the eyes of a child – precisely because he remained sensitive to the condition of the world:

“What do you think an artist is? An imbecile who has only his eyes if he is a painter, or his ears if he is a musician, or a lyre at every level of his heart if he is a poet, or, if he is merely a boxer, only his muscle?

On the contrary, he is at the same time a political being, constantly alert to the heartrending, burning, or happy events in the world, molding himself in their likeness.”


One has to remember that Thought Forms was written at a time when it seemed quite acceptable to merge various schools of thought. Walter Gropius’ 1919 Bauhaus school in Germany reflected this trend too, combing art and architecture in a synthesis which lasts to this day.  Science had yet to reach its zenith as an exploratory tool, and the authors of Thought Forms  expressed the fond belief that science might soon provide positive proof of these proposed layers of existence.

As we know, science began to devote itself largely to matters of commerce, and had already become a tool used by greedy nations to exert a thunderous military might.  Braque was to be permanently incapacitated in the first World War, ending his relationship with Picasso, something symbolic of politicians’ willingness to hurl mankind’s fittest, most able and bravest genetics onto a massive bonfire.  The constant repeating of this pattern through the following 100 years have shown that morally, mankind has been slower to accumulate moral strength than technological obsession.  Perhaps the two can never co-exist, so it is heartening to see the infatuation with technology gradually winding down.

UK MP Anthony Steen was caught spending tens of thousands of taxpayer funds on his country home but refused to admit he had knowingly taken advantage of a crooked system: “I’ve done nothing criminal, that’s the most awful thing, and do you know what it’s about? Jealousy. I’ve got a very, very large house. Some people say it looks like Balmoral. It’s a merchant’s house of the 19th century. It’s not particularly attractive, it just does me nicely”.  I’m sure! And I can think of another big house that would suit him rather well

The psychic nature of man has yet to receive the full attention of science, which has turned from an exploratory to a materialist avenue.  Already some inroads have been made, specificially into meditation, mirror neurons, telomeres, psychic activity within the brain, and so on.  But even without this approval from the stablishment, a person can always feel when they have sustained some damage to this moral body.

The inertia justifying self-indulgence or moral decline has a parallel in human thought.  The idea that there is no tangible component affected by morality – which could theoretically exist in both human and universal forms –  and by extension, no need to consider morality as a factor in self development, has produceda hardy crop of genetic materialists.  These individuals lack spiritual depth, and in extreme cases, emerge from the womb as sociopaths.  Trendy atheism, like the objections to the concept of invisible bacteria and remedies which led to improved medical care, has become an obstacle to evolution, which the mind of man will also abandon

Through amoral or selfish acts and decisions, the damage to the psychic body can be felt for a time, and if persisted in, is rationalised away to avoid the constant nagging by the conscience, just as one who is grossly overweight needs many rationalisations to soothe the guilt: a diet would soon fix the problem – the weight is not so excessive – I’m big boned – I have a fat gene – we all have to die of something – and so on.

Shameless whore: Baroness Uddin claimed £125,000 for a “main home” which was actually a rundown flat she had never even visited.  When the scandal broke she was seen sneaking a mattress and a TV into the flat under cover of night.  Now owning three homes – one with £140,000 worth of renovations directly after being appointed in the House of Lords – she insists she will return to the House of Lords and only repay the money from the £300 a day allowance the taxpayer has to pay her.  This sort of out-and-out stealing is strikingly common in the upper classes.

UK MP Ben Chapman was caught deliberately over-claiming £15,000 on his mortgage but refused to admit he had taken advantage of a crooked system: “It is clear that I was mislead by the fees office into the arrangement in question”

Truth is therefore often the first casualty of damage to the psychic body.  It is for this reason that all religions stress the importance of truth and self-awareness, and it is sensitivity to this subtle layer of our existence which an individual embarking on spiritual practices tries to develop.  Human evolution itself builds this moral increase as it works through the ages: despite the prevalence of materialist greed and degeneration, man is more aware of such glaring abormalities than at any time in the past.  The tendency towards lenience and increasingly humane laws, the rise in women’s rights even in backwards and misogynistic nations such as Saudi Arabia, and the attempts to enshrine not just rules of economic expediency but of morality within law, are the evidence.  We can say that human intellect has leaped ahead of the moral nature, as is obvious from a look around the world, but we should also expect a comparable explosion of development in this element of our personality too, and it is to this end that religion exists.

Adolph Eichmann on trial in 1961: “I was only following orders.”  The individual is a problem to be wiped out when they’re in power, but when asked to justify themselves, the individual is a flimsy, inconsequential being helpless to resist national forces.

In billions of people, a change is slowly brewing, despite fashions, trends, technological toys and distractions: the signs are that mankind is already starting to tire of the constant twisting of technology to short term and faddish ends: Facebook, once a central object of attention has waned, as children – those least deadened by materialistic despair and most attuned to changes in tastes – tire of its limitations, even if connected to thousands of fellow users.

It is to strengthen and clean up the psychic body that the practices of religion are aimed.  This is the only reason why they could have survived for so many thousands of years: the task they present is yet undone and now requires some scientific justification to make themselves presentable to the modern mind, and I am certain that this discovery is just around the corner.

Altruism can be as simple as placing unwanted items on Freecycle, costing nothing at all. The warmth of such transactions is always available: we recently donated a fridge, collected by two Polish lads who could hardly believe their luck.  They later sent us an email, “our mother is so happy – thank you for a great welcome to your country.”

Just as people go to a gym to increase the muscular power of the phjysical body, and do not become discouraged after sprains or short term disruptions to their fitness schedule, nobody should despair at falling short or experiencing setbacks in attempts to raise themselves to higher levels morally.  Those who gravitate to religions and spiritual disciplines are inquiring into or attempting this improvement of a component of their own body – the psychic body -a  subtle level of their existence which is affected by truth, sacrifice, self-discipline and charitable acts, which is why they have always formed a part of healthy religion.

Jennifer Nicole Lee weighed 200lbs after giving birth to her second child.  Deciding to lose weight, within a year she was crowned Miss Bikini America, and went on to become a fitness guru

For the same reason, every religion, and so many heroes of popular myth and storytelling, present an image of a being both human and divine.  Mankind is growing morally towards mental powers which at the present moment would seem more divine than human, and its infatuation with materialism and technology is slowly yielding, in accordance with the demands of evolution, to “an infinitely more rewarding exploration of inner space”.

About iain carstairs

I have a great interest in both scientific advances and the beauty of religion, and created about 15 years ago with the aim of finding common ground between the scientist and the believer, and to encourage debate between the two sides.
This entry was posted in Altruism, Annie Besant, Atheism, Baroness Uddin, Brain damage, Charles Leadbeater, Detachment from materialism, Evolution, Fountain of Youth, Genetic damage, Materialism, Meditation, Meditation, Mental Illness, Psychics, Religious disciplines, Richard Dawkins, Science and Religion, Self discipline, Sixth sense, Spiritual Genius, The Brain, The Magic of Reality, Theosophy, Truth and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Psychic Body: Spiritual Evolution

  1. In order to come to any new understanding of a psychic body, we need a new account of minds whereby they are not completely disembodied! There is a strong tradition in making minds entirely non-spatial. That cannot be correct. We might well accept that minds are not spatial in the sense of being necessarily located in physical space, even if sometimes their effects are localized in physical space (usually, localized in the body of the person). However, to make any psychic body, they must exist in their OWN KIND of space, one that can be disconnected from physical space. The challenge for science is to make sense of that notion.
    That is what I am trying to do.

    • That makes sense to me, too.. Dawkins’ “The God Delusion” and Hitchens’ “God is not great” both avoid the point: how can we find God, when we don’t even know what to look for? Common sense says that organised complexity which aims at a specific task must be a product of intelligence, even if it only assumes the shape of intelligence and is once removed from whatever intelligence actually is, but even this obvious inference is avoided. There is actually no agreed definition of intelligence, and yet people instinctively realise it when they see it. What kind of a science is it that cannot define something to everyone’s satisfaction, when everyone can sense what it is on their own? It shows the inadequacy of science to define the simplest of commonly accepted impressions.

      So what expectation do we have that more complicated reasoning and definitions would ever be applied? I would like to see Richard Dawkins sit down with a proportionally large string of DNA and a pile of amino acids and take the place of a ribosome for a day, to see what he can achieve in the manufacture of proteins, before he declares biological machinery as unintelligent! Perhaps it is our own intelligence which is further removed from whatever pure intelligence actually is, than that encoded in biology. If so, we make fools of ourselves to declare ourselves superior to it; it’s embarrassing to watch people debate such a hopeless point of view.

      It would make more sense to first design a tool which can measure consciousness, in whatever forms we already know it to exist, calibrate it to take into account genius, IQ, EQ, AQ or whatever other kind of Q – and test it to destruction, and only when we know that works, extrapolate from that. If such a tool cannot yet be invented, then there is about as much point us relying on science to discover other forms of intelligence as asking a blind man his opinion about art.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s