No matter who you may be, where you may live or what you may believe, the events of 9/11 changed your life.
It was the pretext for the invasions and the bombing campaigns which plunged the entire middle east into war, creating hundreds of thousand of refugees (the UK-France channel tunnel was closed at Calais only a few days ago by a large crowd of refugees), leaving somewhere between one and four million dead, and shattering millions of lives.
It was the pretext for the Patriot Act and the NDAA, allowing dissenters to be arrested and imprisoned indefinitely without ever knowing the evidence which prompted their kidnapping. It was the pretext for a chain of black prison sites in which ordinary people disappeared – many through simple cases of mistaken identity, confusion or on the hear-say whispers of undisclosed others – some never to be seen again. Many still languish in Guantanamo Bay, without having been charged of any crime. It was the pretext for unprecented surveillance of your phone calls and emails, a project strenuously denied and fnially sheepishly admitted by the NSA – a fine example of trustworthy governance.
In another secret campaign, strenuously denied by both Bush and Blair for years and only admitted under the weight of incontrovertible evidence years later, some of the unfortunates delivered to Guantanamo Bay were first shipped to other countries – including Egypt – for torture. Two Iraqi civilian arrived, as an inmate later reported, “in catastrophic shape, lacking their fingernails and toenails, blood still running from their ears and nose, grown men weeping like babies”. Others met a grisly end in Uzbekistan dungeons, from which survivors reported hearing “clipped British accents, directing each of the interrogators’ questions”.
Some were kidnapped from international airports on the orders of Jack Straw and Tony Blair, and shipped to Gaddafi’s dungeons. Unluckily for Straw and Blair, one such dissident later became commander of the Libyan rebels, and demanded Britain admit to what its henchmen did to his family. These particular victims, paid off this year by well over £400,000 to avoid an embarrassing court case, included his daughter (“these people stole my childhood”) and his heavily pregnant wife – taped immobile to a stretcher, with – in an astonishing act of cruelty – one eye taped open and one taped shut, by two masked men and one masked woman, all with British accents, for an “excruciating seven hour journey” to Libya, where they were immediately chained to walls.
The head of Mi5 was to write jovially of the affair to Gaddafi, still in power at the time: “I do hope you have received the shipment” in a letter later found by rebels raiding Gaddafi’s files. That was one very expensive letter, for you and me, that is – since all the desperate hush money thrown at victims was taxpayer money.
Perhaps, you feel that none of this affects you. But, if you’ve flown since 2001 and were manhandled, humiliated or stripped in the name of “terror prevention”, or, like Professor Richard Dawkins, had your jar of honey confiscated after check-in, you’ve been affected by 9/11. Speeches are still made hearkening back to 9/11, to justify more surveillance, more laws, longer prison sentences, secret tribunals, drone bombings, or the battering down of various doors in the name of “terror prevention”.
The rise of the American police state, where officers can no longer be distinguished from US military forces dressed for the desert in the middle east, the current chaos in Iraq and the subsequent rise of ISIS can be squarely blamed on the invasions justified by 9/11.
14 years later, every week without fail, newspaper headlines scream of “terror” as if they, too, were somehow keen on stoking it. But why? Well, a moment’s thought is enough to realise that few of us, hardly any of us, actually an infitesimal fraction of nine billion people, have actually seen an act of terror in real life. The only place we see it is in the media. So for terror to stop having any widespread effect, all the media would have to do is refuse to report it. Tell us the facts if you must, in a restrained, factual way. But they do the exact opposite.
What they fail to tell us is even more telling: the damage from US drones hitting wedding parties, school children, farmers, families, houses, villages. As it turns out, entire countries are raising generations of children afraid to go out. The sound of an airplane overhead is enough to scare them witless after constant attacks by circling reaper drones. Not because of their media, but because all gatherings of people, bystanders included, are targets for incineration.
The bodies are never identified by America: if they were standing up they’re “suspected militants“; if sitting down: “plotting terror attacks”. Babies are “collateral damage”. Seeing frantic friends and family wading thrugh the rubble of his devastation, Obama saw an opportunity: let’s bomb the rescuers. Seeing the crowds at the funerals he saw another opportunity: let’s bomb their funerals, for Christ’s sake. What did they call this brutal murder? “Double dipping”. Our media don’t care to report on the victims and the trauma we’ve left them. They’re nobodies. When they come fleeing to our shores we protest they’re “chasing our benefits”. The New York Times wordsmiths daintily call drone bombing “a vexing constitutional issue”. War criminals? Tsk! A few bad apples. La-di-dah.
We’ve heard only last week that £20 billion is needed for our terrifying nuclear killing machines ..“to prevent terror.” I’m not kidding. Yes, someone is getting very, very rich from the terror industry – for that is precisely what it is. A new and booming business in which oil and gold and lithium mines are commandeered and looted, countries bombed back to the Stone Age, dissenters kidnapped and imprisoned, or incinerated by reaper drones from afar, citizens treated like dirt, and mass surveillance undertaken in secret – with the catchphrase: “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.”
And this catchphrase comes, incredibly, from those who for fourteen long years have avoided and dodged any scientific investigation into the most significant crime of 9/11 itself: the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings! What has the government got to fear? Well, read on, and you’ll find out!
Yes, if you live on Earth, 9/11 has most certainly affected you. So it may come as a shock to hear that the most significant cause of death on 9/11, the collapse of buildings full of people, was never scientifically investigated. The evidence was cleared away before investigators were allowed on the scene, and physically destoyed or shipped to China before it could be examined. The causes were never explained.
The perpetrators – whoever they were – remain unnamed and unpunished, and free to strike again at a time of their choosing.
Science to the Rescue: Beyond Misinformation
But now the first scientific study of the World Trade Centre’s collapse has been published, entitled Beyond Misinformation. And I think this single document is quite capable of causing the terror industry to collapse at the same rate of free-fall acceleration, carrying with it the crooks, profiteers and assorted psychopaths who plundered the middle east, sacrified millions of lives, caused worldwide terror and sectarian strife, and made vast fortunes at our expense.
Science reveals how those three mighty buildings fell – towers 1, 2 and 7. The first two were seen live on TV, but the third is almost never mentioned in the media despite it having been a colossal 47 stories tall, larger in mass than any steel framed building in Britain. A group of 2,500 architects and engineers have backed the publication of this 48-page, lavishly illustrated report which comprehensively demolishes the media’s thrice-daily repeated story of what happened on 9/11.
Despite what you’ve been led to believe, the astonishing conclusion of this report is that these three mighty towers were not brought down by fires, nor by the aircraft crashes these buildings were specifically designed to survive.
They were brought down by a high grade, highly specialised explosive material called nano-thermite. To judge from the physics of the events and the ample visual evidence, charges were installed on every single floor and against every major column of these three towering structures, well before 9/11 itself. Incredible though this may seem, this is what science says about the destruction of the three World Trade Centre buildings.
Tens of thousands of copies have already gone to decision makers and political figures in America, and I was fortunate last week to receive a crate full which I began to distribute to newspapers, police stations and MPs here in the UK. Until we know who demolished the Trade Center buildings, we cannot be sure that elements within the government itself are not the very terrorists we have been told it is a criminal offence to support.
This eye-opening report is thoroughly researched, full of science, revealing photographs, witness statements and pages of references. Its review committee includes a
- Professor of Engineering and Physics from Maryland
- a Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering from Canada
- a Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering from America
- the former Head of Architecture at Kingston University, London
..and other fully qualified professionals in the fields of Archiecture and Engineering. The report dismantles the NIST report, which can then only be seen as a cover-up based on speculation, not science. In fact NIST’s report flies in the face of known science, some statements being so blatantly wrong they could never have come from even a high school science student, and it is suprising to find NIST did not even attempt to explain the full collapse of the towers and did not even check for explosives, probably because they were told not to. For a document which cost millions and purports to explain the murders of nearly three thousand people, this is an utter disgrace.
Just as I offered on Twitter, the first 30 people who send me their address will receive a free copy when the 3rd mailshot goes out this week.
If we really want to bring an end to the terror industry, the first thing we must do is find who rigged the buildings, and who pressed the button. We need to know who authorised the killing of nearly three thousand of our fellow human beings in New York via the demolition of the World Trade Centre buildings. And the sooner, the better.